Comments on: Practical way to time travel in past http://brijux.com/2009/10/20/practical-way-to-time-travel-in-past/ My view on life, love and everything in between. Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:57:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Brijesh http://brijux.com/2009/10/20/practical-way-to-time-travel-in-past/#comment-6158 Brijesh Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:31:53 +0000 http://brijux.com/?p=374#comment-6158 Sachin, Elaborate what part? Sachin,

Elaborate what part?

]]> By: sachin http://brijux.com/2009/10/20/practical-way-to-time-travel-in-past/#comment-6151 sachin Sun, 23 Jan 2011 18:48:03 +0000 http://brijux.com/?p=374#comment-6151 will u please elaborate will u please elaborate

]]> By: Brijesh http://brijux.com/2009/10/20/practical-way-to-time-travel-in-past/#comment-3464 Brijesh Thu, 13 May 2010 21:07:37 +0000 http://brijux.com/?p=374#comment-3464 @D. Sherman I thought there were only two forms of light in question, particle form and wave form. I never herad of the swirl propagation of light. May be we need more research in this direction. I wish you all the best for your research. @Trailers for sale May be you didn't read the post thoroughly. I am not talking about time travel, I am just proposing an idea on how to look back in time. So there is no used matter and energy in question. @Alina Really? Its a government run program? haha. Guys, Spammers have now reached a new level. I cant tell if the last two comments just above this are real person or they are spammers. The content seems so relevant but they are spam as far as I know. Any ideas? @D. Sherman
I thought there were only two forms of light in question, particle form and wave form. I never herad of the swirl propagation of light. May be we need more research in this direction. I wish you all the best for your research.

@Trailers for sale
May be you didn’t read the post thoroughly. I am not talking about time travel, I am just proposing an idea on how to look back in time. So there is no used matter and energy in question.

@Alina
Really? Its a government run program? haha.

Guys, Spammers have now reached a new level. I cant tell if the last two comments just above this are real person or they are spammers. The content seems so relevant but they are spam as far as I know. Any ideas?

]]> By: alina http://brijux.com/2009/10/20/practical-way-to-time-travel-in-past/#comment-3409 alina Sun, 09 May 2010 20:30:37 +0000 http://brijux.com/?p=374#comment-3409 How do you know Time travelers haven't been here? Do they come up to you and say "Hi I'm a time traveler...oh and put me in a straight jacket and drug me with Demerol while your at it? No its really not that simple. It is a secret Government run program and we have a Temporal Prime Directive to adhere to in order to keep the time line constant. We are only here to observe and report. I am owner of <a href="http://www.luxurysarasotarealestate.com" rel="nofollow">Sarasota Real Estate</a> . How do you know Time travelers haven’t been here? Do they come up to you and say “Hi I’m a time traveler…oh and put me in a straight jacket and drug me with Demerol while your at it? No its really not that simple. It is a secret Government run program and we have a Temporal Prime Directive to adhere to in order to keep the time line constant. We are only here to observe and report. I am owner of Sarasota Real Estate .

]]> By: Trailers for Sale http://brijux.com/2009/10/20/practical-way-to-time-travel-in-past/#comment-3407 Trailers for Sale Sun, 09 May 2010 19:32:24 +0000 http://brijux.com/?p=374#comment-3407 The reason that you couldn't travel back in time, is, among other things, that it has already happened. What I mean by that is that the energy and matter has already been utilized, and subsequently dispersed. My body, all its matter and energy are here, now. You wouldn't be able to visit me in the past, since all of my matter isn't there. Just as this would apply to my body, so would it apply to all matter. As for future travel, all of the energy and matter that will be used to form the future is simply "waiting" to be organized now, and will be by the "time" you get there. The reason that you couldn’t travel back in time, is, among other things, that it has already happened. What I mean by that is that the energy and matter has already been utilized, and subsequently dispersed. My body, all its matter and energy are here, now. You wouldn’t be able to visit me in the past, since all of my matter isn’t there. Just as this would apply to my body, so would it apply to all matter. As for future travel, all of the energy and matter that will be used to form the future is simply “waiting” to be organized now, and will be by the “time” you get there.

]]> By: d. sherman http://brijux.com/2009/10/20/practical-way-to-time-travel-in-past/#comment-1628 d. sherman Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:34:56 +0000 http://brijux.com/?p=374#comment-1628 i really feel light traveling in a ~wave~ is incorrect. like everything else light is 3 dimensional not 2. an energy wave travels in a swirl like water down a drain. the linier imagery of light would be a tube thats size would depend on the amount of particles doing the ole cohesive push-pull. i firmly feel that travel at light-speed is easiest to achieve if a method were developed to utilize the channel within this "tube" the word ~wormhole~ comes to mind. figure this out, then you can do your telescope and mirror idea. (unless they would be serving a better purpose as focusing the direction of your voyage) i really feel light traveling in a ~wave~ is incorrect. like everything else light is 3 dimensional not 2. an energy wave travels in a swirl like water down a drain. the linier imagery of light would be a tube thats size would depend on the amount of particles doing the ole cohesive push-pull. i firmly feel that travel at light-speed is easiest to achieve if a method were developed to utilize the channel within this “tube”
the word ~wormhole~ comes to mind. figure this out, then you can do your telescope and mirror idea. (unless they would be serving a better purpose as focusing the direction of your voyage)

]]> By: Brijesh http://brijux.com/2009/10/20/practical-way-to-time-travel-in-past/#comment-1111 Brijesh Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:44:57 +0000 http://brijux.com/?p=374#comment-1111 @Michael, great idea..!! @Paulius1982, I agree with you @Can Berkol, After getting all your thoughtful commends, I need to re-think about my time travel..!! @Michael, great idea..!!

@Paulius1982, I agree with you

@Can Berkol, After getting all your thoughtful commends, I need to re-think about my time travel..!!

]]> By: Can Berkol http://brijux.com/2009/10/20/practical-way-to-time-travel-in-past/#comment-1071 Can Berkol Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:09:44 +0000 http://brijux.com/?p=374#comment-1071 Hmm, this isn't time travel. Yes, you may see what happened in the past but you will not travel through time. The light itself only caries imagery information; it is not the happening, it is just a record of what's happening... So, what is time really; why do we absolutely connect it to light? Is it because we can only see things with the existence of light. Hmm, then what if I am blind. Does time depend on sound for blind people. What if I am also deaf? Am I timeless, then? Yes, we can watch the past and even the future; but how are we going to shift our existence within time? I don't think light speed alone is the answer.. Time is a relative concept and light is an absolute concept.. hmmmm..... Hmm, this isn’t time travel. Yes, you may see what happened in the past but you will not travel through time. The light itself only caries imagery information; it is not the happening, it is just a record of what’s happening… So, what is time really; why do we absolutely connect it to light? Is it because we can only see things with the existence of light. Hmm, then what if I am blind. Does time depend on sound for blind people. What if I am also deaf? Am I timeless, then?

Yes, we can watch the past and even the future; but how are we going to shift our existence within time? I don’t think light speed alone is the answer.. Time is a relative concept and light is an absolute concept.. hmmmm…..

]]> By: Paulius1981 http://brijux.com/2009/10/20/practical-way-to-time-travel-in-past/#comment-1062 Paulius1981 Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:07:36 +0000 http://brijux.com/?p=374#comment-1062 The biggest point everyone is missing is that in order to see events through this telescope that happened two years in the past from OUR perspecive, we would have to be able to send the telescope to it's destination INSTANTLY. If we assume that, like in your thought experiment, that it would take a year to travel a light year, we wouldn't be able see any further into the past than the day we launched the telescope. IE, if the telescope is launched in 2010, arrives in position 2 light years away in 2012, the 'earliest' that telescope will be able to see is 2010. The only way to see the past from our perspective is if the telescope could break the speed of light. For example, if we could launch a telescope on Jan 1st 2010 and have it arrive two light years away on Jan 2nd, then we would be able to see 'back' to 2008. The whole 'seeing backwards in time' depends on being able to get somewhere before the light reflecting of our planet does. If we could match the speed of light, we could certainly set up a telescope that would allow people in the future to see 'now' from our perspective, but as someone mentioned above, we might as well just use a regular old video camera...the picture quality would be much better for one. The biggest point everyone is missing is that in order to see events through this telescope that happened two years in the past from OUR perspecive, we would have to be able to send the telescope to it’s destination INSTANTLY.

If we assume that, like in your thought experiment, that it would take a year to travel a light year, we wouldn’t be able see any further into the past than the day we launched the telescope.

IE, if the telescope is launched in 2010, arrives in position 2 light years away in 2012, the ‘earliest’ that telescope will be able to see is 2010.

The only way to see the past from our perspective is if the telescope could break the speed of light.

For example, if we could launch a telescope on Jan 1st 2010 and have it arrive two light years away on Jan 2nd, then we would be able to see ‘back’ to 2008.

The whole ‘seeing backwards in time’ depends on being able to get somewhere before the light reflecting of our planet does. If we could match the speed of light, we could certainly set up a telescope that would allow people in the future to see ‘now’ from our perspective, but as someone mentioned above, we might as well just use a regular old video camera…the picture quality would be much better for one.

]]> By: Michael http://brijux.com/2009/10/20/practical-way-to-time-travel-in-past/#comment-953 Michael Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:24:44 +0000 http://brijux.com/?p=374#comment-953 Why don't we just put up a giant mirror, that way the light we would see bouncing off the mirror would be an image of 2 years ago. Also, we wouldn't have to worry about the whole wireless transmitting thing, we would just have to point our telescope at the mirror. Why don’t we just put up a giant mirror, that way the light we would see bouncing off the mirror would be an image of 2 years ago. Also, we wouldn’t have to worry about the whole wireless transmitting thing, we would just have to point our telescope at the mirror.

]]>